Murgatroyd: Dan, you work in surgical innovation, but you’re also a professor of robotic vision. What exactly does that mean?
Stoyanov: It’s a fair question — I sometimes ask myself the same thing. My work focuses on helping surgical robots “see” more like surgeons. For about 25 years, I’ve worked on technology that analyzes surgical video to understand what’s happening during a procedure — what anatomy is visible, how instruments are moving, and how the surgery is progressing. These are things humans process instinctively, and we’re teaching machines to do something similar.
Murgatroyd: Why should patients care about how surgeons learn and collaborate?
Stoyanov: Because learning directly impacts care. I like to compare surgery to elite sports. When you watch a game, you see deep analysis — how players move, how teams coordinate. Surgeons haven’t always had that same ability to analyze their own “game footage.” Digitizing surgery allows them to review procedures, learn from peers, and continuously improve. That ultimately benefits patients.
Murgatroyd: So, surgeons really are like elite athletes?
Stoyanov: Absolutely. Surgeons train for decades. They rely on precision, dexterity, and deep knowledge of anatomy — just like athletes rely on physical and mental mastery. Giving them better tools to refine their skills makes a real difference.
Murgatroyd: What does digitizing surgery unlock?
Stoyanov: It creates opportunities to review, share, and connect. Surgeons can look back at procedures, collaborate more easily, and learn from one another. It makes surgery more analytical and data informed.
Murgatroyd: And from a patient perspective, why does that matter?
Stoyanov: Surgery is an anxious experience for most people. As a patient, you want your surgeon to be as prepared as possible and able to make the best decisions in the moment. Better tools help support that.