Study results show that video laryngoscopy can improve first pass intubation success during routine intubation.†,1
The EMMA study was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compared the use of the McGRATH™ MAC video laryngoscope (VL) with direct laryngoscopy in 2,092 patients between 2015 and 2019. Study results showed significantly higher first pass intubation rates with the McGRATH™ MAC VL compared to direct laryngoscopy, as well as overall improved intubation success.1
In addition to higher first pass intubation success rates and overall improved intubation success, the EMMA study also identified other benefits of the McGRATH™ MAC VL compared to the direct laryngoscope, including better glottic views and better overall intubation difficulty scores.1
The EMMA study found that the McGRATH™ MAC VL improved first pass intubation success for trainees and experienced clinicians alike:1
When you reach for the McGRATH™ MAC VL as your everyday intubation device, you set yourself up for improved intubation success. The McGRATH™ MAC VL combines line of sight video with the familiar Macintosh technique, so you retain your traditional laryngoscopy skills. It is a single, reusable handheld device with five sterile, disposable blade options to support pediatric to adult patients, and straightforward to difficult airways.
Discover what makes the McGRATH™ MAC VL the cost effective device for routine use.
Review the clinical evidence that supports using the McGRATH™ MAC VL to improve intubation success.
Learn how the hyperangulated McGRATH™ MAC X3 blade can help you get a handle on the most difficult airways.
For trained personnel only. For specific indications and instructions for use, please refer to the product manual.
† Compared to direct laryngoscopy.
1. Kriege M, Noppens RR, Turkstra T. EMMA Trial Investigators Group. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of the McGrath™ Mac videolaryngoscope versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(6):722−729.
2. Thaler A, Mohamod D, Toron A, Torjman M. Cost Comparison of 2 Video Laryngoscopes in a Large Academic Center. J Clin Outcomes Mgmt. 2021;28(4):174-179. doi:https ://doi.org/10.12788/jcom.0055.
3. Samuels JD, Tangel VE, Lui B, et al. Adoption of video laryngoscopy by a major academic anesthesia department. J Comp Eff Res. 2021;10(2):101−108. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0185.
4. Moucharite MA, Zhang J, Giffin R. Factors and economic outcomes associated with documented difficult intubation in the United States. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;1;13:227−239.