Tri-Staple™ technology
Less stress.1,2,†,‡ Greater perfusion.3,†,‡ Superior performance.2,4-7,§,Ω
Maximize blood flow,1,†
maximize confidence
For fewer leaks,2,‡,§ superior staple line strength,3,4,Ω,†† and less stress.5,6,†,‡‡
Tackle variable tissue
with confidence
For superior staple line strength3,4,Ω,†† when dealing with challenging tissue and anatomy.
Manage stress,
increase confidence
For superior strength,2,3,§,Ω greater access,6,7 and less stress4,5,††,‡‡ on tissue.
Tri-Staple™ technology reloads are designed to work in harmony with the natural properties of tissue before, during, and after stapling. Each reload has a stepped cartridge face that delivers graduated compression and three rows of varied height staples
The result of that design is a reload that provides superior strength and leak resistance4,8,Ω,†† across procedures.
No single stapler can address the wide range of tissue management issues faced by surgeons on a daily basis. That’s why we’ve given our entire portfolio the power of Tri-Staple™ technology. So you can have reliable results — no matter your specialty.
Each Tri-Staple™ reload has a stepped cartridge face that delivers graduated compression and three rows of varied height staples. That design helps generate less stress on tissue during compression and clamping.1,2,†,‡
Tri-Staple™ technology’s graduated compression profile and varied height staples allow greater perfusion into the staple line.3,†
With unique design features, reloads with Tri-Staple™ technology deliver superior performance across a broad range of thicknesses.2,4,7,§,Ω
Smart performers rarely operate alone.
Tri-Staple™ 2.0 reloads are equipped with a computer chip that can communicate information during your procedure. When Signia™ and Tri-Staple™ 2.0 are combined you will receive information on the Signia™ screen before, during & after you fire, to help support clinical decision making.9
Tri-Staple™ Speciality reloads are designed to help you address procedurally specific challenges. All including Tri-Staple™ 2.0 technology for real-time feedback, the Curved Tip, Black, 30 mm, Reinforced and Radial reloads are all designed to work with both our Manual and Signia™ handles.
For superior staple line strength4,8,§§§,ΩΩΩ when dealing with challenging tissue and anatomy.
For fewer leaks,11,†††,‡‡‡ superior staple line strength,4,8,,§§§,ΩΩΩ and less stress.1,8,ΩΩ,††††
For superior strength,4,11,‡‡‡,§§§ greater access,2,12 and less stress1,8,ΩΩΩ,†††† on tissue.
† Compared to flat-faced cartridges with single-height staples.
‡ Compared to Echelon Flex™* green reloads analysis comparing different stapler designs, performance and impact on tissues under compression using 2-D finite element analysis.
§ Preclinical results may not correlate with clinical performance in humans.
Ω Bench test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance. Compared to Ethicon Echelon Flex™*.
†† Staple line strength: Endo GIA™ tan reload vs. Echelon Flex™* white reload and Endo GIA™ purple reload vs. Echelon™* green, gold, and blue reloads. Leak resistance: In-vitro synthetic leak comparison: Endo GIA™ purple reload vs. Echelon™* blue and gold.
‡‡ Bench test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.
§§ Based on burst pressure testing in porcine colon comparing GIA80MTS (n = 12) and GIA80XTS (n = 12), Ethicon™* TLC75 (n = 24; p=0.010), Frankenman™* LC80B™ (n = 24; p = 0.000), and Panther™* SSAB-80 (n = 24; p=0.000).
ΩΩ Compared to flat-faced cartridges with single-height staples.
††† Preclinical results may not correlate with clinical performance in humans.
‡‡‡ Based on leak testing in in vivo canine model comparing TRIEEA25XT to Ethicon™* CDH25P (n = 9; P = 0.002), where 50 mm Hg represented a maximum expected colonic pressure.
§§§ Bench test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.
ΩΩΩ Staple line strength: Endo GIA™ tan reload vs. Echelon Flex™* white reload and Endo GIA™ purple reload vs. Echelon™* green, gold, and blue reloads. Leak resistance: In-vitro synthetic leak comparison: Endo GIA™ purple reload vs. Echelon™* blue and gold.
†††† Compared to Echelon Flex™* green reloads analysis comparing different stapler designs, performance and impact on tissues under compression using 2-D finite element analysis.
‡‡‡‡ Based on staple-line vascularity analysis using MicroCT in an in vivo canine model (CDH31P: n = 13; TRIEEA31XT: n = 15. P = 0.007).
§§§§Compared to GIA™ staplers with DST Series™ technology
1. Based on internal test report #PCG-007 rev 1, Perfusion into Clamped Media. Sept. 2, 2011.
2. Based on internal test report #PCG-018, 2-D FEA of linear staplers. November 2012.
3. Based on internal test report #2128-002-2, Final analysis of staple-line vascularity using MicroCT. July 2015.
4. Based on internal test report #PCG-001, Tyvek pull-apart test comparing Echelon™* and Tri-Staple™ technology. March 2011.
5. Based on internal test report #PCG-004, Undercrimp comparisons in increasing pads of foam between Echelon™* and Tri-Staple™ technology. January 2012.
6. Based on internal test report #PCG-006, Staple formation comparison between Medtronic EGIA60AXT and Ethicon ECR60G in an ex-vivo tissue model. January 2012.
7. Based on internal test report #PCG-019, Comparative test of Endo GIA™ stapler using black reloads with Tri-Staple™ technology and Ethicon Echelon Flex™* black reloads. June 2014
8. Based on internal test report #PCG-002, In-vitro leak comparison. March 08, 2011.
9. Based on PT00002451 Signia™ Stapler User Manual, Page 13.
10. Based on report #RE00324614 rev B, Lily comparative testing versus competitive devices. November 2021.
11. Based on internal report #RE00318260 rev 1, Comparative leak testing for EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology and Ethicon™* CDH. April 2021.
12. Based on report #RE00142825, Image creation for Signia™ small diameter reload. March 26, 2019.
13. Based on internal report #RE00330708-rev1, Perfusion analysis for circular staplers, comparing EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology. May 13, 2021.
14. Based on RE00498029 Competitive Evidence Final Report Signia with Tri-Staple Technology vs Intuitive's Da Vinci Robotic Stapling System with SureForm SmartFire Technology Competitive Evidence Final Report Rev A 2024
15. Based on interna test report RE00365456 In vivo leak test Tri-Staple EEA (TRIEEA25XT) and Ethicon Echelon Powered Stap (CDH25P)
16. Based on internal test report RE00171002 80mm GIA Tri-Staple Technology - Design Verification Report
You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you may go to a site run by someone else.
We do not review or control the content on non-Medtronic sites, and we are not responsible for any business dealings or transactions you have there. Your use of the other site is subject to the terms of use and privacy statement on that site.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site are not approved in your region or country.