You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you will leave this site and go to a site run by someone else.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site not be licensed for sale in Canada.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
By choosing to accept, you acknowledge that you are a Certified Healthcare Professional.
The Mazor™ robotic guidance platform combines advanced surgical planning software with 15 years of Mazor robotic guidance and 25 years of Stealth™ Navigation experience.CONTACT US
Go beyond individual pedicle trajectory guidance to complete spine construct design.
See how pre-operative planning, robotic guidance, and surgical navigational all work together.
The MazorTM robotic guidance system allows for pre-operative or intra-operative planning. With features such as customizable implant selection, optimal implant trajectories and 3D analytics, planning allows you to work towards construct optimization and make the procedure predictable.
State of the art registration and mechanical stability are critical to establish robotic precision. The Mazor™ platform secures a closed-loop connection between the bed-mounted robotic arm, the patient secured on the bed, and a rigid fixation between the robot and patient’s skeletal anatomy. The robot is table mounted for a small OR footprint.
Based on decades of experience, Stealth™ Navigation technology allows for real-time visualization of the implant entering the anatomy relative to the pre-operative plan. Execute the procedure intra-operatively by combining two guidance technologies in a comprehensive platform that helps you achieve your surgical goals with confidence. Navigation provides the visibility that closes the loop on the execution of the plan.
DISCLAIMER: The evidence reported here refers to various Mazor robotic guidance system generations that share Mazor Core Technology.
Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Minimally invasive robotic versus open fluoroscopic-guided spinal instrumented fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42(6):353–8
Kim HJ, Jung WI, Chang BS, Lee CK, Kang KT, & Yeom JS. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot‐assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robotics ComputAssist Surg. 2016 13(3), e1779.
Khan A, Meyers JE, Yavorek S, et al. Comparing Next-Generation Robotic Technology with 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Navigation Technology for the Insertion of Posterior Pedicle Screws. World Neurosurg 2019; 123, e474-e481.
Onen MR, Simsek M, & Nader S. Robotic spine surgery: a preliminary report. Turk Neurosurg, 2014 24(4), 512-518.
Fan Y, Du J, Zhang J, Liu S, Xue X, Huang Y, Zhang J, Hao D. Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 16;23:5960-5968.