The Sonicision™ system is the industry’s first cordless, ultrasonic dissection system offering the widest portfolio and ease of standardization.
It allows for improved freedom of movement in the operating room through the innovation of cordless technology.([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal report #R0014853 rev A. Usability validation report. April 6, 8-9, 20-21, 26 2010 and May 4-6, 2010.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=])
The Sonicision™ system is designed to accommodate a variety of open and laparoscopic procedures in the following areas:
The Sonicision™ cordless ultrasonic device is available in four lengths to meet different procedural needs:
The revolutionary design of the Sonicision™ cordless ultrasonic dissection device gives surgeons freedom of movement in the OR – eliminating the frustration of managing cords on a sterile field, while allowing for rapid dissection of tissue and security of hemostasis.1,2
In addition, the intuitive dual-mode energy activation control offers minimum and maximum power modes within one button for easy transition between energy modes, further enhancing surgeon focus on the patient.1
The reusable hand-held generator working in concert with the reusable battery produces ultrasonic energy that delivers a variety of tissue effects. The ability to take the sophistication of a generator and shrink it down to easily fit in the palm of your hand is real innovation that frees the surgeon from the need to connect the device to a bulky generator outside of the surgical field.
†Reduction of cords improves safety in the O.R. AORN Report: Brogmus G, Leone W, Butler L, Hernandez E . Best practices in OR suite layout and equipment choices to reduce slips, trips, and falls. AORN (Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses) J. 86:384–398.
‡Tsirline VB, Lau KN, Swan RZ, Montero PN, Sindram D, Martinie JB, Iannitti DA., Evaluation of an innovative, cordless ultrasonic dissector. Surg Innov. 2013.
§Based on internal testing comparing the Thunderbeat™* (seal and cut mode) and Sonicision™ (min. mode) on isolated vessels.
ΩBased on internal testing conducting one seal/cut cycle on mesentery tissue.
††When compared to the Harmonic ACE™* on maximum power through 10 cm of porcine mesentery. Results show a statistically significant (P < 0.0001) difference in mean dissection speed. Tsirline VB, Lau KN, Swan RZ, Montero PN, Sindram D, Martinie JB, Iannitti DA., Evaluation of an Innovative, Cordless Ultrasonic Dissector. Surg Innov. 2013.
‡‡Based on Kim FJ, Sehrt D, Pompeo A, Molina WR., Comparison of surgical plume among laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors using a real-time digital quantitative technology. Surg Endosc. 2012.
§§Based on internal testing done on maximum power through 15 cm of porcine mesentery.
ΩΩBased on internal testing using minimum mode on isolated vessels.
†††Based on internal testing using minimum mode on various isolated vessels and tissue types.
‡‡‡Based on internal testing using minimum mode on isolated vessels.
§§§Based on internal testing conducting 10 consecutive device cycles on porcine mesentery.