Precision and efficiency for better dissection([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal report #RE00114823, Validation labs: surgeon evaluation of LigaSure™ exact dissector, nano-coated. July 18 to 26, 2017.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),† — with a cool jaw profile([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal report #RE00107711 RevA, Market research: Thermal profile comparison of LigaSure™ exact dissector and the Ethicon Harmonic Focus™*+ conducted on porcine tissue. August 2017.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]) and enhanced ability to work in tight spaces.1,‡ Discover the latest innovation in the LigaSure™ portfolio.
Built on reliable LigaSure™ technology, our newest surgical advancement offers faster cooling times2 with superior access and more precise dissection.1,†
Find out how the LigaSure™ exact dissector delivers better access and more efficient dissection1† — and cooler temperatures2 — than our competitors.
Learn how our innovative LigaSure™ exact dissector gives you precision and efficiency in the OR.1
Our new LigaSure™ exact dissector makes cutting and sealing simple.1,§
Low temperature profile
The LigaSure™ exact dissector is designed to:
Precise performance
The fine, curved jaw of the LigaSure™ exact dissector:
Its jaw also applies equal force on opposing tissue planes for effective blunt dissection.
Balanced handling
Engineered for fine dissection, the LigaSure™ exact dissector offers:
Improved efficiency
The fast cooling times of the LigaSure™ exact dissector mean:
All delivered with the speed and reliable performance of LigaSure™ vessel sealing technology.
The LigaSure™ exact dissector is an advanced energy device powered by the Valleylab™ FT10 and LS10 energy platforms. It’s one more example of our commitment to helping you advance patient care.
Find out why we use standard deviation to support LigaSure™ technology.
†Compared to the LigaSure™ small jaw device (16 out of 16 surgeons surveyed agreed) and the Harmonic Focus™*+ device (11 out of 12 surgeons agreed).
‡21 out of 22 surgeons surveyed agreed.
§23 out of 23 surgeons surveyed agreed.
Ω19 out of 21 surgeons surveyed agreed.
††22 out of 23 surgeons surveyed agreed.
‡‡13 out of 14 surgeons agreed.
§§11 out of 12 surgeons agreed.