3 Barriers to Building a RAS Program (and Solutions to Overcome Them)

When a hospital is planning to start a robotics program, inevitably there will be some nuanced challenges and potential barriers. However, for Dr. John Lenihan, Chief Clinical Officer, Surgical Science Mimic Technologies in Seattle, WA, some issues remain common in virtually every hospital setting.

We spoke with Dr. Lenihan to learn about his experiences. “There are three big hurdles to consider when starting a robotics program,” he says. And he would know. As one of the first GYN surgeons in the state of Washington to perform robotic surgery, Dr. Lenihan spent more than 20 years managing the robotics program at MultiCare Health in Tacoma, WA, before moving to Mimic Technologies.

So what are the 3 potential barriers to building a RAS program — and how can a hospital overcome them?

#1: Buy-in from Hospital Administration

When starting a RAS program, the first big hurdle to clear is getting support from executive leadership. Hospital administration must be bought-in, as they are responsible for prioritizing funding across the institution. Expect to encounter some resistance: robotic systems are expensive, and it takes time to train everyone. And you’re likely going up against other departments and specialty areas that are vying for the same attention from executives. How can you achieve buy-in when you’re competing with so many other groups for financial support?

Solution: Lead with Vision

“You have to have forward-thinking, visionary leadership,” says Dr. Lenihan. When the competition is tough and the money is tight, the best way to gain buy-in is to lead with a solid vision and a well-thought-out plan that aligns to the hospital’s priorities. Be able to show how this initiative will deliver patient care and a patient experience that is connected to the hospital’s goals and objectives.

“It’s also critical to demonstrate the financial and outcomes-based benefits of taking a patient-first approach to the program”, Dr. Lenihan adds. Include a training plan, so there is a clear path for the different specialties and groups who will be using the robot. And suggest forming a committee to oversee and regulate the use of the robot to ensure every step is done right. By leading the charge with a strong vision for the future, you’ll help administrators connect your RAS program aspirations with their overall institutional priorities.

“You need visionary leaders, from the surgeon side and from the executive side, who get together and say, ‘This is the right thing to do for the patient. This is the right thing to do for outcomes.’ If you do the right thing, it's going to be successful.”

–Dr. John Lenihan, Chief Clinical Officer, Surgical Science Mimic Technologies

#2: Resistance to Culture Change

Effective RAS programs optimize utilization and drive efficiency. They can also enable more minimally invasive surgeries. However, new RAS programs come with new techniques, new processes, and new ways of doing things. In some hospitals, it might be difficult to make a compelling case for change.

Furthermore, sometimes hospital culture can be fraught with silos. Each silo has its own goals, which can lead to a culture of competition that’s not necessarily healthy. “People can end up working against each other,” says Dr. Lenihan, “because they're each trying to make their own team look better than the other departments.” This culture of competition can lead to a reluctance to share information and collaborate in new ways. How can you drive change in this type of environment, when it seems like the cards are stacked against you?

Solution: Be Fully Inclusive

“The hospital world runs by committee," says Dr. Lenihan. "So, you have to get everyone on board.” These committees are typically categorized by specialty, procedure, and administrative function. To bring a robotics program into a hospital system, you need a dedicated RAS committee. And to be successful, that committee should be widespread and goal oriented.

“For it to work,” says Lenihan, “you just can't decree from above. You must generate support from below. You have to get all the stakeholders involved, from multiple different disciplines.” That means including everyone: physicians, anesthesia, nursing services, engineering, supply teams, financial and marketing – even specialties that won’t be using the robot yet. Each of these areas need to be trained in the use of the robot, to learn how to communicate and be on the same page.

Together, this multi-disciplinary committee will set goals and tackle everything from scheduling and timing in the OR and defining which nurses and teams can work on the robot; to setting up credentialing and privileging for the different specialties and determining who will proctor it. By bringing everyone together, you’ll ease all teams into the culture shift – and you’ll have the stakeholders on board to advocate for the program and generate excitement.

#3: Lack of Transparency

“The whole transparency issue is a big problem in medicine,” says Dr. Lenihan, “particularly when it comes to surgeons and their proficiency.” Measuring and tracking performance can be difficult to implement, especially when new technologies are being added to the OR. No one wants to be assessed while they are improving their skills. So how do you bring more transparency to the factors that really matter?

Solution: Put Patients First

For Dr. Lenihan, the answer is simple: “You have to be willing to put the patient's interests first – ahead of professional pride. Whatever's going to work best for the best patient outcome, that's clearly the high road, and it’s just the right thing to do.”

Putting the patient first applies to all aspects of the patient experience – including what goes on behind the scenes. Be honest and clear about the skills and proficiencies of the surgical team. Stay transparent with how things are working, documenting usage, utilization, times in the OR and even complications. Report on everything from efficiency to safety and make the results visible across the system. Put updates in the hospital newsletter and in newspapers and online – let people know what you are doing and how it’s working. By putting patients first and focusing on true transparency, you’ll become the “go-to” hospital for patients in your area.

Breaking Barriers to Expand What’s Possible

When it comes to robotic-assisted surgery, technology is evolving so quickly that it requires healthcare organizations to stay focused on what matters most. For us, that means supporting hospitals and surgeons with a holistic approach, focused on the entire RAS program ecosystem. By developing a strong vision for the future, approaching each step with inclusivity and respect, and putting patients first, we can help expand what’s possible in robotic-assisted surgery.

More articles

Building a Successful Robotic Surgery Program Through Partnership

Mineh Nazary, strategic business developer for surgical robotics, shares her insights on patient outcomes, challenges, and technology in RAS.

5 Questions to Answer Before Starting a RAS Program

Robotics industry expert Josh Feldstein shares the top five questions a hospital must consider before starting a robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) program – and why having clearly-defined answers is so important.

Changing the Training Game: One Path to Standardized Training for Robotic-assisted Surgery

Prof. Dr. Alexandre Mottrie shares his perspective on setting training standards for robotic-assisted surgery (RAS).

How to Start a Sustainable RAS Revolution in Your Hospital

Medtronic Robotics System Utilization Manager, Berta Ortiga, shares her perspective on the best way for hospitals to approach investing in robot-assisted surgery technology and building a successful robotics program.

Obesity and Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS)

Dr Anna Fagotti, Director of the Ovarian Cancer Unit at Polyclinico Gemelli, shares some of her insights about the challenges of surgically treating obese patients and how she uses robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) to overcome some of those challenges. 

Women Are Leading the Way in Surgical Robotics

Listen to the voices on a typical leadership call with our Surgical Robotics operating unit (OU) and it becomes abundantly clear — women are leading the way in this future-focused mission to bring robotic-assisted surgery to more places and more people.

Can RAS Drive Ergonomic Improvements for Surgeons?

Dr. Erik Wilson shares insight from his experience in performing over 4,000 cases of robotic general surgery since 2002 and the longest series of robotic gastric bypasses in the world.

Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Ergonomics of RAS: A Review of the Evidence

While surgeons work to heal their patients, technology advancements in the OR work to keep surgeons well, too. Jed Farlow, Lead Human-Centered Design, Medtronic Surgical Robotics R&D, gives his insight.

How PBP is Transforming RAS Training

Learn how Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP) can maximize training outcomes in this article featuring the expert who invented it.

Want the latest RAS updates?

Sign-up now to stay up to date, share with your network, and continue learning from experts who are building best practices in RAS training and program development.

Sign up

The Medtronic Hugo™ RAS system is commercially available in certain geographies. Regulatory requirements of individual countries and regions will determine approval, clearance, or market availability. In the EU, the Hugo™ RAS system is CE marked. In the U.S., the Hugo™ system is an investigational device not for sale. Touch Surgery™ Ecosystem is not intended to direct surgery, or aid in diagnosis or treatment of a disease or condition.