• £ In comparison to AbsorbaTack™ fixation device 

  • § Based on potential for eliminating contralateral ports and average savings when 31-50 tacks are needed 

  • ‡ When 30-60 tacks are needed

  • † Compared to Absorbable and Permanent Fixation Devices Commercially Available, which include SecureStrap™* device, SorbaFix™* device, OptiFix™* device, Capsure™* device, ProTack™ device and ReliaTack™ device with Standard Purchase Tacks when the shaft is angled at 30°, 45°, 65° and 90° (bench testing)

  • 1. Mesh Overlap Claims Testing Report R0054140 P-Value= 0.007 (March 2014)

  • 2. ReliaTack Deep Purchase Tack Shear Pull Test RE00010135-1 P-value= 0.00 (October 2015)

  • 3. ReliaTack™ DPT Cost Comparison,  ReliaTack™ Deep Purchase Internal Average Cost Data compared to SecureStrap™* and SorbaFix™* IMS Data

  • 4. Design Verification – Articulation Angle Engineering Report R2165-050 (March 2014)

  • 5. IMS Trocar ASP Analysis. Evaluates Average Trocar Cost (March 2014)

  • 6. Engineering Development of Reliability Testing Report 2165-037-0 (March 2014)

  • ¤ Average of greatest estimated per-case savings over SecureStrap™* and SorbaFix™* when 31-50 tacks are needed

  • ¶ Articulation may save up to $100 per case by potentially eliminating contralateral ports