Synthetics
Mastergraft™ bone graft
<p>Mastergraft™ bone graft is a synthetic scaffold that comes in versatile formats to support bone healing and remodeling in spinal and orthopedic procedures.</p>
Features
Available in granules, putty, strip, and matrix EXT formats, Mastergraft™ is indicated for bony voids or gaps not intrinsic to structural stability and can be used as a bone graft extender in spine, pelvis, ilium, and extremity procedures.
The Mastergraft™ family facilitates the delivery — and maintains the viability — of the patient’s own cells.2 The interconnected porosity allows for cell infiltration, vascularization, and space for new bone formation.†,2,3,6,7
91% radiographic fusion rate
in a rabbit study using 50/50 allograft/autograft†,4
Biologic compatibility
- Acts as a cell carrier for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), facilitating colonization and bone formation.‡,3
- Compatible with SmartStorage™, an RFID-based tissue tracking system for inventory and compliance.
Engineered chemistry
- Biphasic composition (85% β-TCP, 15% HA) balances fast and slow resorption.1
- Average pore diameter: 500 µm; interconnected diameter: 125 µm.
† Data on file. Animal studies are not necessarily indicative of human clinical outcomes.
‡ Data on file. In Vitro testing not indicative of human clinical outcomes.
- Wakimoto M, Ueno T, Hirata A, Iida S, Aghaloo T, et. al. Histologic evaluation of human alveolar sockets treated with an artificial bone substitute material. J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Mar;22(2):490–3. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318208bacf. PMID: 21415629; PMCID: PMC4045110.
- Zannettino AC, Paton S, Itescu S, Gronthos S. Comparative assessment of the osteoconductive properties of different biomaterials in vivo seeded with human or ovine mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Dec;16(12):3579-87. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0153. Epub 2010 Aug 30. PMID: 20666614.
- Data on file at Medtronic.
- Smucker, J. D., E. B. Petersen, J. V. Nepola, and D. C. Fredericks. “Assessment of Mastergraft Putty as a Graft Extender in a Rabbit Posterolateral Fusion Model.” Spine 37, no. 12 (2012): 1017–21. Reports 91% radiographic fusion and 73% manual palpation fusion for 50% putty composite, outperforming autograft alone.
- Zou C, Zhang E, Li M, Zeng S. Preparation, microstructure and mechanical properties of porous titanium sintered by Ti fibres. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Jan;19(1):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0103-0. Epub 2007 Jul 3. PMID: 17607525.
- Kim HJ, Park JB, Lee JK, Park EY, Park EA, Riew KD, Rhee SK. Transplanted xenogenic bone marrow stem cells survive and generate new bone formation in the posterolateral lumbar spine of non-immunosuppressed rabbits. Eur Spine J. 2008 Nov;17(11):1515- 21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0784-9. Epub 2008 Sep 25. PMID: 18815818; PMCID: PMC2583184.
- Dunkley IR, Vickers SM, Badura J, Toth J. A Histological Assessment of the Mechanism of Early-Stage Healing of a Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in an In Vivo Rabbit Model. KEM 2018;782:275–82