View a detailed overview of the ILLUMISITE™ fluoroscopic navigation technology and how it, combined with the CrossCountry™ transbronchial access tool, gives you the power to display position and access nodules — moving lung health technology forward.
Diagnostic screening systems
ILLUMISITE™ fluoroscopic navigation platform
<p>The ILLUMISITE™ platform gives you the power to access nodules in the pulmonary tract.</p>
Features
One fully integrated navigational platform for lung biopsy
See the real target
With its ability to correct for CT-to-body divergence, the ILLUMISITE™ platform is clinically proven to help you accurately navigate lung nodules. With its unique fluoroscopic navigation technology utilizing digital tomosynthesis, you’ll have greater confidence that you’re in the right spot before you biopsy.#,¶,1,7,8
Lock on in real time
At every stage of the biopsy procedure, you’ll remain on target with continuous guidance. The precision of continuous guidance makes continued target alignment possible across multiple tool uses — without the need to reinsert the locatable guide. And it’s designed for multidirectional sampling for a more thorough biopsy.¶,7
Tools that take aim at lung challenges
Discover our comprehensive range of biopsy tools. From pulmonary needles to cytology brushes, our diverse portfolio ensures you have access to the tools you need for tissue sampling.
Clinically proven outcomes for lung biopsy
The VERITAS study: the ILLUMISITE™ platform versus CT‑guided biopsy
The ILLUMISITE™ platform is the first and only clinically proven solution to have a higher diagnostic outcomes compared to CT-guided biopsy.§,9
In the VERITAS randomized controlled trial, the ILLUMISITE™ platform showed 79.0% diagnostic accuracy through 12-months of clinical follow-up, compared to 73.6% with CT-guided biopsy.§,9Additionally, the ILLUMISITE™ platform showed zero false negatives at 12-month diagnostic follow-up.§,9
Most important, lung biopsy with the ILLUMISITE™ platform has 6x fewer patient complications than CT-guided biopsy.§,9
Diagnostic accuracy through 12-months of clinical follow-up§,9
| 79.3% | 73.6% |
ILLUMISITE™
platform |
CT-guided
biopsy |
Overall patient complications§,9
5.0%
|
29.2%
|
ILLUMISITE™
platform |
CT-guided
biopsy |
Hear experts discuss results of the VERITAS study
With the ILLUMISITE™ platform, higher complication rates are no longer a necessary tradeoff for the procedural outcome your patients require.§,9
The RELIANT study: the ILLUMISITE platform™ vs. the Ion™* platform
The RELIANT trial found that diagnostic yield outcomes with the ILLUMISITE™ platform rivals the Ion™* platform.‡,6
Additionally, lung biopsy procedures with the ILLUMISITE™ platform are shorter in duration when compared to the Ion™* platform.‡,6
Diagnostic Yield: Overall‡,6
| 75.5% | 77.8% |
ILLUMISITE™
platform |
the Ion™*
platform |
Median procedure time: as measured from the start of airway registration to the removal of the bronchoscope‡,6
32
minutes
ILLUMISITE™ platform
37
minutes
The IonTM* platform
More about the ILLUMISITE™ platform
Lung biopsies are challenging — the ILLUMISITE™ platform is helping to solve for that. (05:10)
Hear what clinicians are saying about the ILLUMISITE™ platform. (06:34)
Resources
Related products
† Based on evidence from a single-center study.
‡ Based on non-inferiority single-center RCT. Procedure duration was measured in minutes from the start of airway registration to the removal of the bronchoscope.
§ Based on a non-inferiority RCT; safer biopsy based on overall complication rate.
¶ Based on evidence from a single-center prospective study including a total of 82 consecutive patients.
# Based on evidence from a single-center retrospective study including a total of 72 consecutive patients.
TM* Third-party brands are trademarks of their respective owners.
- Folch, E. E., Labarca, G., Ospina-Delgado, D., Kheir, F., Majid, A., Khandhar, S. J., ... & Fernandez-Bussy, S. (2020). Sensitivity and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for lung cancer diagnosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest, 158(4), 1753-1769.
- Folch, E. E., Pritchett, M. A., & Nead, M. A. (2018). Brief Title: Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Lung Lesions Title: Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: One-Year
- Pritchett MA, Bhadra K, Mattingley JS. Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy With Tomosynthesis-based Visualization and Positional Correction: Three-dimensional Accuracy as Confirmed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2021;28(1):10-20. doi:10.1097/LBR.0000000000000687.
- Medtronic financial and market analysis as of November 2021 of ENB and robotic lung navigation systems in market demonstrating Medtronic leading market share as defined by percentage of capital system sales.
- Münch T. et al., Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB) versus Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy (SS-RAB) lung navigation platforms - a cost-minimization analysis. The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) annual meeting, Atlanta, GA 2024.
- R. Paez, et. al. Robotic Versus Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary Lesion Assessment. Results from the RELIANT Randomized Trial [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:A5018. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.Abstracts.A5018
- Avasarala SK, Roller L, Katsis J, et al. Sight Unseen: Diagnostic Yield and Safety Outcomes of a Novel Multimodality Navigation Bronchoscopy Platform with Real-time Target Acquisition. Respiration. Published online September 03, 2021. doi: 10.1159/000518009.
- Dunn BK, Blaj M, Stahl J, Speicher J, Anciano C, Hudson S, Kragel EA, Bowling MR. Evaluation of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy using tomosynthesis-assisted visualization, intraprocedural positional correction and continuous guidance for evaluation of peripheral pulmonary nodules. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2022
- Lentz R. et al. Navigational Bronchoscopy or Transthoracic Needle Biopsy for Lung Nodules. The New England Journal of Medicine. Published May 18, 2025. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2414059