1O years advancing leadless pacing together
First human implant in 2013
Micra™ VR CE mark approval in 2015
You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you will leave this site and go to a site run by someone else.
Medtronic does not review or control the content on the other website, and we are not responsible for any business dealings or transactions you have there. Your use of the other site is subject to the terms of use and privacy statement on that site.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site are not approved in the Indian Subcontinent.
Any and all information provided is intended for general overview. Viewers taking any decision based on the information provided herein are requested to seek professional advice.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
The content of this webpage is exclusively reserved for registered medical practitioners.
Click “OK” to confirm you are a registered medical practitioner.
First human implant in 2013
Micra™ VR CE mark approval in 2015
Explore the exciting and evolving journey of leadless pacing. This EHJ supplement, with the contribution from esteemed physicians, provides a comprehensive overview of the advancements, clinical applications, and future directions of leadless pacemaker technology over the past decade.
The Micra™ AV2 and Micra™ VR2 have projected median longevities of nearly 16–17 years, meaning more than 80% of patients will only need one Micra™ device for life.3
These innovations required zero change to the device size.
Micra™ AV2 automatically customizes AV synchrony settings for each patient, reducing the need for manual programming by more than 50% compared to Micra™ AV.3
The smarter algorithms also improve automatic AV synchrony at faster heart rates between 80–100 bpm,3 and the upper tracking rate limit is now 135 bpm.
The updated delivery system now has a rounded catheter tip with more surface area to decrease tip pressure during device implant.4
Micra™ AV2 and Micra™ VR2 devices are implanted with the same streamlined procedure that has been utilized by nearly 10,000 trained Micra™ physicians worldwide.5
Micra™ AV2 and Micra™ VR2 provide an unmatched leadless pacing experience for bradycardia patients.
With improved battery longevity and smarter algorithms, most patients will only need one device for life.3
The 105 cm long delivery system has a handle that controls deflection and deployment of the Micra™ pacing capsule. There are five key components:
The Micra™ introducer sheath enables smooth vessel navigation with a lubricious hydrophilic coating and silicone oil-coated dilator tip. It has a 23 Fr inner diameter and 27 Fr outer diameter. There are three key components:
Micra™ AV is an effective therapy for patients with AV block6
85.4% Sustained resting AV synchrony and stable through 3-months follow-up.
82.6% Improved ambulatory AV synchrony with optimized programming.
No upgrades through three months with no major complications due to pacemaker syndrome.
30-day and 2-year results7,8
Administrative claims-based study of Medicare beneficiaries implanted with Micra AV (compared with a contemporaneous cohort of transvenous dual chamber pacemakers, TV-DC).
1-year results (interim analysis)
Prospective, nonrandomized, real-world registry of Micra AV patients with adjudication of system and procedure-related events by an independent clinical events committee (compared with historical comparator cohort for transvenous dual chamber pacemakers, TV-DC).
3-year results
Administrative claims-based study of Medicare beneficiaries implanted with Micra VR (comparing with a contemporaneous cohort for transvenous single chamber pacemakers, TV-VVI).
5-year results
Administrative claims-based study of Medicare beneficiaries implanted with Micra VR (comparing with a historical cohort for transvenous single chamber pacemakers, TV-VVI).
| Parameter |
Micra AV2 |
Micra VR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pacing mode |
VVI, VVIR, VOO, OVO, VDD, VDI, ODO, OFF |
VVI, VVIR, VOO, OVO, OFF |
| Mass |
1.75 g |
1.75 g |
| Volume |
0.8cc |
0.8 cc |
| Electrode spacing |
18 mm |
18 mm |
| Battery longevity |
15.6 years1 |
16.7 years1 |
| Accelerometer-based mechanical atrial sensing |
Yes |
N/A |
| Accelerometer-based rate response |
Yes |
Yes |
| MRI SureScan™ |
≤ 3T |
≤ 3T |
| CareLink™ remote monitoring |
Yes |
Yes |
Reach out to LifeLine CardioVascular Tech Support with questions.
Toll Free: 1800-419-6700
(Monday to Saturday 8 AM to 11 PM)
Access interactive courses, videos, and educational resources to extend your learning on Micra.
†Rates adjusted for differences in patient baseline characteristics.
*CMS suppression requirement for values <11.
10 Years of Leadless Pacing. Eur Heart J Suppl. Volume 27, Issue Supplement_2, March 2025.
Nippoldt D, Whiting J. Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Device Volume Characterization Comparison. November 2014. Medtronic data on file.
Piccini, J.P. et al. Potential Implications of Recent Enhancements in Leadless Pacemaker Technology on Device Management and Healthcare Utilization: A Virtual Patient Analysis. Heart Rhythm 2024, Volume 21, Issue 9, S780.
Roberts PR et al, Preclinical cardiac perforation reduction in leadless pacing: An update to the Micra leadless pacemaker delivery system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1085-1091.
Susumu A. 10,000 Micra trained physicians. February 2023. Medtronic data on file.
Chinitz LA, El-Chami MF, Sagi V, et al. Ambulatory atrioventricular synchronous pacing over time using a leadless ventricular pacemaker: Primary results from the AccelAV study. Heart Rhythm. January 2023;20(1):46–54.
Crossley, et al. Outcomes of Patients Implanted with an Atrioventricular Synchronous Leadless Ventricular Pacemaker in the Medicare Population. Heart Rhythm. September 2023. Heart Rhythm 2024;21:66–73.
El-Chami et al. Two-year outcomes of Micra AV leadless pacemakers in the Micra AV CED study. Heart Rhtyhm, Volume 21, issue 5, supplement S356, MAY 2024 PO-03-037.
Garweg, et al. A Leadless Ventricular Pacemaker Providing Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing in the Real-World Setting: 12-Month Results from the Micra AV Post-Approval Registry. Heart Rhythm. June 2024.
Crossley GH, Piccini JP, Longacre C, et al. Leadless versus transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow-up of the Micra CED study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. April 2023;34(4):1015–1023.
El-Chami M, et al. Leadless pacemaker in 5-year follow-up: The Micra transcatheter pacing system post-approval registry. European Heart Journal (2024) 45, 1241–1251.