FEWER INTERRUPTIONS,
BETTER INTERVENTIONS

Making alarms smarter is not just about reducing false alerts, but also about improving patient outcomes. That’s why clinicians are seeking new ways to optimize alarms — including customizing parameters and using data algorithms.

Here’s why: After implementing automated vital signs monitors at 12 general wards, one study found a 13 percent increase in survival rate.([FOOTNOTE=Bellomo R, Ackerman M, Bailey M, et al. A controlled trial of electronic automated advisory vital signs monitoring in general hospital wards. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(8):2349–2361. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318255d9a0.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),†  

SMARTER ALARMS

ONE CHANGE,
MANY IMPROVEMENTS

At the Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, one team integrated wireless communication devices with remote patient monitors. The change helped prioritize requests, triage calls, and manage code blue alarms.([FOOTNOTE=Turisco F, Rhoads, J. Equipped for Efficiency: Improving Nursing Care Through Technology. Published Dec. 2008. Accessed Jan. 29, 2012. ],[ANCHOR=California Health Care Foundation Website],[LINK=https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PDF-EquippedForEfficiency.pdf])

The results:6

  • Decreased call response times — from three minutes and 10 seconds to 34 seconds
  • Nurses reported fewer interruptions
  • † Among patients transferred to a higher acuity ward following rapid response team treatment.