No Image Available

Defibrillator leads

OmniaSecure™ defibrillation lead

<p>The lumenless OmniaSecure™ lead is 4.7 French and enables precise lead placement in the right ventricle (RV), inclusive of left bundle branch area (LBBA).</p>


Product details

Watch the product journey.

Learn more about the OmniaSecure™ defibrillation lead.




This is a close-up view of the OmniaSecure™ defibrillation lead stress test to ensure durability at implantation with green decorative elements behind it.

Built for high reliability

Durable, lumenless construction

  • Built on the proven SelectSecure™ 3830 pacing lead platform1,2
  • High projected 10-year fracture-free rate, based on comprehensive, robust benchtop testing3,4

Reliable therapy delivery

  • High defibrillation efficacy at implant1,5
  • Stable electricals (sensing, pacing, impedance) through follow-up6,7



This is an illustration showing how the OmniaSecure™ defibrillation lead is implanted into the heart with green decorative elements behind it.

Implant with precision

  • FDA approved for LBBAP in both adults and adolescent pediatric populations
  • High implant success for standard RV and for LBBAP with ICD and LOT-CRT applications1,5
  • Lumenless design supported by a comprehensive suite of catheters to support precise placement

This is an image of the OmniaSecure™ defibrillation lead with green decorative elements behind it.


The world’s smallest defibrillation lead

  • Lumenless, 4.7 French, 64% smaller than Sprint Quattro™ defibrillator lead8
  • May reduce potential lead-related complications, such as vascular occlusion or tricuspid valve complications9–11
  • Smaller leads are projected to reduce worsening of tricuspid regurgitation compared to larger leads12

Clinical evidence


OmniaSecure LEADR Global Pivotal Trial

The OmniaSecure™ lead has demonstrated high defibrillation success, low complications, and reliable therapy delivery in the LEADR Global Pivotal Trial through three years.

Primary safety objective met, exceeding performance goal, and in line with industry reports5

Primary objective passed, exceeding performance goal, and in line with industry reports1

Reliable performance and high durability consistent with reliability modeling through three years5




Cardiac lead reliability model — OmniaSecure™ defibrillation lead 10-year results

The novel, small-diameter OmniaSecure™ lead is predicted to be highly durable with an overall 98.2% fracture-free rate at 10 years, inclusive of adolescent pediatric population.3




OmniaSecure™ LEADR LBBAP Global Trial

The OmniaSecure™ lead demonstrated high defibrillation success and low complication rate when placed in the LBBA.

Primary safety objective met, exceeding performance goal7

Primary objective passed, exceeding performance goal6

Reliable performance with stable pacing, sensing, and impedance7



Specifications

This is an illustration of the OmniaSecure™ defibrillation lead with numbered callouts.


1. 4.7 Fr lead body

2. DF4 connector

3. Fixed helix

4. Steroid-eluting MCRD ring

5. Defibrillation coil

6. Integrated bipolar sensing

7. Conductor cable: MP35N

8. Inner insulation: ETFE

9. Inner insulation: silicone

10. Conductor coil: silver cored MP35N

11. Conductor coil insulation: SI polyimide

12. Outer insulation: 55D polyurethane


Implant procedure

Watch to learn more about the OmniaSecure™ lead implant procedure.


Ordering information

Item number Type Fixation Connector MR Conditional length (cm) Diameter (Fr)
3930M64 Single coil, bipolar Helix, active fixation DF4 64 4.7
3930M69 Single coil, bipolar Helix, active fixation DF4 69 4.7
3930M74 Single coil, bipolar Helix, active fixation DF4 74 4.7
3930M79 Single coil, bipolar Helix, active fixation DF4 79 4.7
3930M84 Single coil, bipolar Helix, active fixation DF4 84 4.7

 

  1. Crossley GH III, Sanders P, Hansky B, et al. Safety, efficacy, and reliability evaluation of a novel small-diameter defibrillation lead: Global LEADR pivotal trial results. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21(10):1914–1922. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.067.
  2. Crossley GH, Sanders P, De Filippo P, et al. Rationale and design of the Lead EvaluAtion for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34(2):257–267. doi:10.1111/jce.15747.
  3. Crossley GH, Mason PK, Hansky B, et al. High predicted durability for the novel small-diameter OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. Heart Rhythm. 2025;22(2):302–310. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.005.
  4. OmniaSecure Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Reliability Modeling. March 2026. Medtronic data on file.
  5. Vijayaraman P, Liu X, Denman R, et al. Safety and performance of a novel defibrillation lead for left bundle branch area placement: Primary results of the LEADR LBBAP clinical trial. Heart Rhythm. Published online October 17, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.028.
  6. Crossley GH, Sanders P, Hansky B, et al. Safety and efficacy of the novel OmniaSecure defibrillation lead through long-term follow-up: Final results from the LEADR Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2026;19(1):e014424. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.125.014424.
  7. Vijayaraman P. Longer-term safety and LOT-CRT functional outcomes using a novel, small-diameter defibrillation lead: Final results of the LEADR LBBAP clinical trial. Oral presentation at: Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Sessions; April 23–26, 2026; Chicago, IL.
  8. SecureD Lead Cross-Sectional Area and Volume Calculations. September 2021. Medtronic data on file.
  9. Bharmanee A, Zelin K, Sanil Y, Gupta P, Karpawich PP. Comparative chronic valve and venous effects of lumenless versus stylet-delivered pacing leads in patients with and without congenital heart. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38(11):1343–1350. doi:10.1111/pace.12728.
  10. Çeliker C, Sayman H, Ersanli M, et al. Diagnosis of abnormal subclavian venous flow by radionuclide venography in patients with permanent pacemaker. Int J Angiol. 1998;7(3):265–267. doi:10.1007/BF01617409.
  11. Tatum R, Maynes EJ, Wood CT, et al. Tricuspid regurgitation associated with implantable electrical device insertion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(8):1297–1302. doi:10.1111/pace.14287.
  12. Oks D, Schaller RD, Mason PK, Sack KL. Smaller defibrillation lead diameter is associated with less tricuspid regurgitation: a computational modeling study. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2026;23(1):69–76. doi:10.1080/17434440.2025.2594458.