Directional atherectomy
To address the perception of limited published data supporting the use of atherectomy to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD),1 Medtronic partnered with Jeffrey Carr, MD; Ralf Langhoff, MD; and Eric Secemsky, MD, MSc, to conduct the most comprehensive review of atherectomy literature for peripheral endovascular interventions to date.
They set out to discover the:
322
original research articles published through November 2024
322 published papers on atherectomy for endovascular treatment of occlusive or stenotic disease in native, infrainguinal peripheral arteries, including2:
Meta-analyses, case studies, and redundant datasets included in systematic review but excluded from quantitative meta-analysis. Case studies defined as either single-patient case studies or case series with < 10 patients and presenting no aggregate data.
The systematic literature review found the highest levels of evidence were represented, including meta-analyses, randomized trials, and prospective, multicenter observational studies.
Atherectomy was associated with low rates of 12-month patency loss, target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation, and mortality, as well as low bailout stenting rates. These rates compare favorably to published meta-analysis rates for uncoated balloon angioplasty and drug-coated balloon without atherectomy.3–6
Meta-analysis rates and confidence intervals
Meta-analysis rates and 95% confidence intervals
Meta-analysis rates and 95% confidence intervals
The overall analysis shown on the first graph includes all device classes. The second graph shows the analysis for studies that evaluated only directional atherectomy.
Results show patients treated with directional atherectomy had lower rates of TLR, amputation, mortality, and bailout stenting than the overall analysis.2
Meta-analysis rates and 95% confidence intervals
Meta-analysis rates and 95% confidence intervals
Nonredundant prospective and retrospective observational studies, including nonoverlapping claims/database analyses (e.g., Medicare, VQI). Case studies fewer than ten patients and meta-analyses excluded.