Our range of endoscopic suturing devices enable you to perform advanced suturing and knot tying with ease and speed.
The Endo Stitch™ device is the most popular suturing technology in the world, used in more than 2 million surgical cases.1
Save time
Our Endo Stitch™ suturing device reduces laparoscopic suturing time by 45-70% compared with conventional suturing.2–5
Save money
Approximately €1,600* saved per procedure compared with robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies.6
Our Endo Stitch™ device together with our VLoc™ wound closure device enables simple and secure wound closure.
Simplicity – no knots needed
Our revolutionary V-Loc™ device uses unidirectional barbs to distribute tension across the wound, holding the edges together without knots.
Security – greater strength
Using the Endo Stitch™ device with our V-Loc™ device will provide you with greater wound closure strength compared with the Stratafix™* Spiral.7,8†
Our endoscopic suturing devices are used for a range of minimally invasive and laparoscopic procedures, such as:
Please refer to the package insert for complete instructions, contraindications, warnings and precautions.
* Euros converted from US dollars as of 02/2019 by XE.com.
† Based on tests using an animal model.
1. Internal report. Five-year retrospective view of internal COGNOS data and extrapolated sales calculations.
2. Nguyen NT, Mayer KL, Bold RJ et al. Laparoscopic suturing evaluation among surgical residents. J Surg Res. 2000;93:133–136.
3. Pattaras JG, Smith GS, Landman L, Moore RG. Comparison and analysis of laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing devices: preliminary results. J Endourol. 2001;15:187–192.
4. Stringer NH. Laparoscopic myomectomy with the Endo Stitch™ 10-mm laparoscopic suturing device. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3:299–303.
5. Adams JB, Schulam PG, Moore RG et al. New laparoscopic suturing device: initial clinical experience. Urology. 1995;46:242–245.
6. Hart S, Hashemi L, Sobolewski CJ. Effect of a disposable automated suturing device on cost and operating room time in benign total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures. JSLS. 2013;17:508–516.
7. Zaruby J, Gingras K, Taylor J, Maul D. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:232–240.
8. Gingras K, Zaruby J, Maul D. Comparison of V-Loc™ 180 wound closure device and Stratafix™ Spiral knotless tissue-closure device for intradermal closure in a porcine in vivo model: evaluation of biomechanical wound strength. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1053–1058.
9. Endo Stitch™ suturing device. Instructions for Use. 2011.
10. Omotosho P, Yurcisin B, Ceppa E et al. In vivo assessment of an absorbable and nonabsorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21:893–897.
