Overview

LESS BLEEDING.([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal test report #RE000036877, Data collected during 17 procedures for product introduction. April–June 2017.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Roje Z, Racić G, Dogas Z, Pisac VP, Timms M. Postoperative morbidity and histopathologic characteristics of tonsillar tissue following Coblation™* tonsillectomy in children: a prospective randomized single-blinded study. Coll Antropol. 2009;33(1):293–298.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Lachanas VA, Prokopakis EP, Bourolias CA, et al. LigaSure™ versus cold knife tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(9):1591–1594.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),†
LESS TISSUE DAMAGE.([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal test report #RE00015788, Tissue testing. March 23, 2017.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Wilson YL, Merer DM, Moscatello AL. Comparison of three common tonsillectomy techniques: a prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical study. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(1):162–170.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Jones DT, Kenna MA, Guidi J, Huang L, Johnston PR, Licameli GR. Comparison of postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing Coblation™* tonsillectomy versus cautery tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(6):972–977.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=])
MORE EFFICIENT TONSILLECTOMY.1,([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal test report #RE00073873 and #RE00079704, Independent surgeon and nurse feedback collected during Medtronic-sponsored labs. January and February 2017.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Lee SW, Jeon SS, Lee JD, Lee JY, Kim SC, Koh YW. A comparison of postoperative pain and complications in tonsillectomy using BiClamp forceps and electrocautery tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(2):228-234.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Omrani M, Barati B, Omidifar N, Okhovvat AR, Hashemi SA. Coblation™* versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized controlled trial. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17(1):45-50.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Shah UK, Galinkin J, Chiavacci R, Briggs M. Tonsillectomy by means of plasma-mediated ablation: prospective, randomized, blinded comparison with monopolar electrosurgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(6):672-676.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),‡

The BiZact™ tonsillectomy device allows surgeons to remove tonsils efficiently, with less bleeding1-3,† and minimal tissue damage.4-6 So patients may experience less pain after surgery.4-6,§

The BiZact™ tonsillectomy device is the right tool for the job — and it makes all the difference.

A procedural solution from Valleylab™ energy, the BiZact™ tonsillectomy device features:

  • 12 cm shaft for access 
  • Curved jaw that follows the shape of tonsil bed
  • Intuitive controls to seal and divide tissue and vessels up to 3 mm in diameter([FOOTNOTE=BiZact™ Tonsillectomy Device [instructions for use]. Boulder, CO: Medtronic; 2017.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=])
  • Ergonomic handle for comfort in both hands

See the device in action

Watch a tonsillectomy procedure with the BiZact™ device.

Watch Video

Features

Outperforms Other Tonsillectomy Technologies

From a fast and easy setup7,₤ to reliable seals that reduce intraoperative bleeding,1-3,†  the BiZact™ device improves efficiency throughout procedures.1,7-10,‡ With a low energy profile and minimal tissue damage,4-6 patients may also experience less pain after surgery.4-6,§

Compared to published literature on the rate of intraoperative bleeding in tonsillectomy using electrosurgery, the Coblator™* instrument, and cold knife, the BiZact™ device reduces bleeding during surgery.1-3,†  

The BiZact™ device is also easier to set up than the Coblator™* instrument.7,₤

Technology

LOW ENERGY LEVEL.
HIGH CLINICAL VALUE.

The BiZact™ device is an advanced bipolar tissue sealer and divider. It’s powered by Valleylab™ energy platforms that:

  • Measure impedance of clamped tissue 
  • Adjust energy output to create a permanent seal
  • Automatically stop energy delivery when the seal is complete

As a result of this technology, the BiZact™ device:

  • Offers fast and easy setup7,₤
  • Produces seals that withstand 3x normal systolic blood pressure([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal test report #RE00077022, Porcine testing: probability of burst ≥ 360 mm Hg is ≥ 96.1%. Jan. 9–10, 2017.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=])
  • Reduces bleeding during surgery1-3,†
  • Improves procedural efficiency1,7-10,‡
  • Minimizes tissue damage,4-6 which may reduce postoperative pain4-6
  • † Average intraoperative bleeding in 17 cases was 7.3 mL for BiZact™ device, compared to published literature results for Coblator™* device (10.83 mL) and electrocautery (27.08 mL),2 and cold knife (125 mL).3

  • ‡ Average procedure time in 17 cases for the BiZact™ tonsillectomy device was 9.35 minutes, compared to published literature results for electrocautery (14.8  minutes pediatric, 20.5 minutes adult)8 and the Coblator™* device (16.32 minutes).9

  • § Low thermal damage has been shown in published studies to result in less postoperative pain. The Bizact™ device has been shown to produce <1 mm thermal spread, but has not been directly evaluated for pain reduction.

  • ₤ 12 out of 12 surgeons and 13 out of 15 nurses surveyed agreed.

Provide details to continue

  • Your information will be protected in accordance with our privacy statement.

The site needs to use cookies to store information in your web browser, to make this site work. By clicking “Submit” you consent to the placement of these cookies. Learn more about our cookie policy.