Featuring fast1, efficient resection, advanced fluid management and pathology optimized tissue removal devices, the TruClear™ system offers a complete technology platform for the removal of a range of intrauterine abnormalities.
“With the TruClear system, I can address a wide spectrum of abnormalities with one high-performing system.” - Dr. Charles E. Miller, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL
With 2% of the lesions remaining in situ after a TruClear™ procedure compared to 87% after a blind D&C, the TruClear™ system offers a clear advantage over traditional methods.1,2
Compared to electrical resection, a TruClear™ procedure is also faster, safer and less painful.1,3
Gain insight into how to remove retained products of conception under direct visualization in this Interactive, app-based simulation with virtual procedure footage.
1. Smith, PP, MBChB; Middleton, LJ, MSc; Connor, M, MD and Clark, TJ, MD (2014). Hysteroscopic Morcellation Compared With Electrical Resection of Endometrial Polyps.(2014). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 123(4), 745-751.
2. Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L. Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(12):1131–1136.
3. Emanuel, M.H., and Wamsteker, K. (2005). “The Intra Uterine Morcellator: A New Hysteroscopic Operating Technique to Remove Intrauterine Polyps and Myomas.” TheJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 12(1), 62-66.
4. NICE. Hysteroscopic morcellation of uterine leiomyomas (fibroids). 2015:1-9.
5. van Dongen H, Emanuel MH, Wolterbeek R, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas: a randomized controlled pilot study among residents in training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(4):466-471.
6. Hamerlynck, TWO, MD; Blikkendaal, MD, MD; Schoot, BC, MD, PhD; Hanstede, MMF, MDand Jansen, FW, MD, PhD. (2013). “An Alternative Approach for Removal of PlacentalRemnants: Hysteroscopic Morcellation.” JMIG December 2013 20(6), 796-802.
7. Pampalona JR, Bastos MD, Moreno GM, et al. A comparison of hysteroscopic mechanical tissue removal with bipolar electrical resection for the management of endometrial polyps in an ambulatory care setting: preliminary results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(3):439-445.
8. Cooper N a. M, Clark TJ, Middleton L, et al. Outpatient versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding: randomised controlled non-inferiority study. Bmj. 2015;350(mar23 6):h1398-h1398.
9. Clark TJ, Middleton LJ, Cooper NA, et al. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient versus inpatient polyp treatment(OPT) for abnormal uterine bleeding. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2015;19(61):1-194.
10. Raw data from Hysteroscopic Morcellation Compared with Electrical Resection of Endometrial Polyps. Smith, P et al, S&N Report# 15002510