Please note you are entering now content intended only for Healthcare Professionals.
Are you a HCP?
Colorectal surgery:
The main challenges
In colorectal surgery, every procedure is unique and can be challenging in its own way. Anatomical variations, restricted access or obstruction, extensive bleeding, inadvertent trauma, inflammation or infection, and anastomotic leaks – can all impact performance and patient recovery.
To confidently navigate these challenges, colorectal surgeons can rely on Tri-Staple™ technology and energy devices.
Maximizing blood supply to the anastamotic site is crucial in reducing the risk of anastomotic leaks. The intricate handling and twisting of the bowel during resection can inadvertently compromise blood flow which can undermine performance and lead to an unsatisfactory procedural outcome.
Tri-Staple™ technology’s graduated compression profile and varied height staples allow greater perfusion into the staple line.1,†
The world's first smart stapler10
The Signia™ Stapling system works with a variety of existing Medtronic Stapling reloads and the portfolio of compatible reloads is continually expanding. When coupled with Tr-Staple 2.0 reloads it provides real-time feedback to help empower surgical decision making.11,††
Ensuring the right amount of pressure, the GIA™ stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology:
For improved blood supply, the EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology:
Three‑row versus two‑row circular staplers for left‑sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score‑matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
Preliminary evaluation of two‑row versus three‑row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection: a single‑center retrospective analysis.
Effectiveness of a new triple-row circular stapler in reducing the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A historical control and propensity score–matched study.
Clinical impact of the triple-layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.
† Compared to flat-faced cartridges with single-height staples.
‡ Based on staple-line vascularity analysis using MicroCT in an in vivo canine model (CDH31P: n = 13; TRIEEA31XT: n = 15. P = 0.007).
§ Preclinical results may not correlate with clinical performance in humans.
Ω Based on leak testing in an in vivo canine model. Comparing TRIEEA25XT to Ethicon™* CDH25P (n = 9; P = 0.023), where 50 mm Hg represented a maximum expected colonic pressure.
†† Bench test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.
‡‡ Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to determine the strain profiles of three circular staplers during clamp-up. The EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology demonstrated a graduated compression profile upon clamping.
§§ Based on perfusion analysis of Endo GIA™ staplers with Tri-Staple™ technology’s graduated-height staple lines vs. Ethicon Echelon™* two-row, single-height staple lines (EGIA n =12, Ethicon n = 14; p = .011).
ΩΩ Compared to GIA™ staplers with DST Series™ technology.
††† 30 of 33 surgeons surveyed after use agreed.
‡‡‡ 33 of 33 surgeons surveyed after use agreed.
§§§ 31 out of 32 surgeons surveyed after use agreed.